Thursday, October 6, 2022
14.1 C
Galway
HomeBeef‘We must get the payment under the suckler cow scheme up to...
Catherina Cunnane
Catherina Cunnanehttps://www.thatsfarming.com/
Catherina Cunnane hails from a sixth-generation drystock and specialised pedigree suckler enterprise in Co. Mayo. She currently holds the positions of editor and general manager at That's Farming, having joined the firm during its start-up phase in 2015.
Reading Time: 3 minutes

‘We must get the payment under the suckler cow scheme up to €300/cow’

IFA president, Tim Cullinan, has called for increased targeted support for suckler and sheep farmers.

He made the call whilst addressing the Joint Oireachtas Committee on Agriculture yesterday (Wednesday, April 14th), 2021.

During the discussion on proposed amendments to the Good Agricultural Environmental Conditions, he said:

“Deputy Carthy raised a very important point about smallholdings with high payments per hectare. This is critical. Those smallholders are getting caught up in this, as they were in the past. We have a very clear view.”

“We need targeted schemes. As I stated, we must ensure there are more targeted schemes in Pillar 2 co-funded by the Government.”

“For example, we must ensure we get the payment under the suckler cow scheme up to €300 per cow and get a proper payment of up to €30 per ewe as well.”

Destroy farm viability

The farm leader warned the focus of the Common Agricultural Policy reform has the potential to destroy farm viability in Ireland.

“At present, Teagasc has identified that only a third of farmers in Ireland are viable. This reform could destroy many of these farmers by taking payments from them to fund convergence, eco schemes and applying more environmental restrictions,” he said.

“The reality is that direct payments from CAP are becoming less about supporting food production and farm incomes, and instead focusing more heavily on an ever-increasing environmental ambition,” he said.

“Farmers are committed to the environment, but the key question is who will pay for this? There is no extra money for the CAP, and the idea that consumers will pay more is not supported by any evidence. It is clear the full cost burden will fall on farmers,” he said.

“Farmers are completely in the dark as regards what will be involved in these so-called eco-schemes, and could lose up to 30% of their Basic Payment or face huge costs to draw it down,” he said.

Internal convergence has also had a “very significant impact” on farmers who have above average entitlements per hectare but who may have a small number of hectares.

“These farmers cannot take any more cuts, and it’s making more farmers unviable. The Minister must find a way of protecting active farmers in this category,” he said.

Convergence proposals

Furthermore, the IFA has proposed that a full sectoral impact analysis of the convergence proposals be conducted.

CAP reform 2021-2027 must not create more unviable farmers, he added.

On the GAEC 2 proposals, it is extremely important that any provisions relating to the protection of peatlands and wetlands are sensible and practical and do not restrict good agricultural practices.

“Furthermore, the introduction of GAEC 2 cannot lead to the imposition of new, additional bureaucratic requirements on farmers.” the IFA leader said.

Meanwhile, the ICSA has said that CAP payments must better support low-income farmers.

- Advertisment -

Most Popular